Tulips have no uses except their aesthetic value (unlike other commodities like gold or silver or even diamonds, all of which have other uses). So why did such a trivial flower cost ten times as much as a skilled craftsman's yearly wages?
One obvious reason that many economists cite was the novelty of a certain kind of tulip, which increased the demand for tulips several folds (Similar, in my opinion, to the novelty of Tech IPOs during the Dot-Com in 1999). Novelty of a good and the promises of unlimited potential always cause mass hysteria and demand for the product. Another reason was the scarce supply of the tulip bubble in the Netherlands at that point of time (People had started hoarding tulip bubbles). Yet another reason was that the tulip had become a highly coveted luxury good and a status symbol, an indicator of wealth and power.
When there was finally a correction in the price of the tulip flower, the Dutch economy was in shock. People were left with useless tulip bulbs that were suddenly worthless. The Tulip Bubble was first chronicled in Chrles Mackay's book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. In Mackay's account, panicked tulip speculators sought help from the government. The government declared that that anyone who had bought contracts to purchase bulbs in the future could void their contract by payment of a 10% sum.
Happy Investing (Hopefully not in tulips)
Madhav Behl (On Behalf of The Doodle Corporation).
No comments:
Post a Comment